Dualism all the way down: why there is no paradox of phenomenal judgment

نویسندگان

چکیده

Epiphenomenalist dualists hold that certain physical states give rise to non-physical conscious experiences, but these experiences are themselves causally inefficacious. Among the most pressing challenges facing epiphenomenalists is so-called “paradox of phenomenal judgment”, which epiphenomenalism’s ability account for our knowledge own experiences. According this objection, we lack very thing take physicalists be unable explain. By developing an epiphenomenalist theory subjects and mental states, paper argues there nothing paradoxical or problematic about epiphenomenalist’s understanding judgments self-knowledge. The appearance paradox emerges from inconsistently combining (epiphenomenalist) dualism qualia with a physicalistic conception experience. lesson should not anything wrong epiphenomenalism, “dualists all way down”—embracing picture mind gives phenomenology central place, in its both their minds. Epiphenomenalist-friendly accounts reference memory also developed, showing neither issues creates epiphenomenalist.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

There Are No Phenomenal Concepts

It has long been widely agreed that some concepts can be possessed only by those who have undergone a certain type of phenomenal experience. Orthodoxy among contemporary philosophers of mind has it that these phenomenal concepts provide the key to understanding many disputes between physicalists and their opponents, and in particular offer an explanation of Mary’s predicament in the situation e...

متن کامل

There is No Paradox of Logical Validity

A number of arguments, including (Whittle 2004), (Field 2008), (Shapiro 2012), and (Beall & Murzi 2012), have been put forward for the claim that logical validity is plagued by a paradox (or paradoxes) similar to the more well-known paradoxes that afflict notions such as truth, knowledge, or set. These claims are incorrect. As I will show here, there is no paradox of logical validity. In additi...

متن کامل

Why Believe That There Is a God?

This article presents an argument for the existence of God, showing that the evident phenomena are best explained by supposing that a God causes them. The argument is based on the inductive force of four very evident general phenomena: that there is a physical Universe; that it is governed by very simple natural laws; that those laws are such as to lead to the existence of human bodies; and tha...

متن کامل

There Is No Best Method - Why ?

Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your perso...

متن کامل

Software Safety : Why is there no Consensus ?

Development and assessment of safety critical software is governed by many standards. Given the growing dependence on software in a range of industries, one might expect to see these standards reflecting a growing maturity in processes for development and assessment of safety critical software, and an international consensus on best practise. In reality, whilst there are commonalities in the st...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Synthese

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['0039-7857', '1573-0964']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03654-6